Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Amplifier\s+required\s+for\s+LF\s+DX\/weak\s+signals\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Re\:\s+Amplifier\s+required\s+for\s+LF\s+DX\/weak\s+signals\?\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Re: Amplifier required for LF DX/weak signals? (score: 1): Author: "Daniele Tincani" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 09:02:06 +0200; Thank you very much, Jim. Very kind of you to provide this comprehensive answer to my inquiry. Best regards Daniele Dear Daniele, LF Group, opinion is that a bigger non-amplified loop is better than; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00268.html (14,962 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]