Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+RL\s+aerial\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+RL\s+aerial\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: RL aerial (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:58:44 +0100; Hi Joe the sloping top would reduce thr Rrad a little so <1ohm ....crank the Variac back upagain :-)) -- Original Message -- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, J; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00479.html (10,813 bytes)
2. LF: RE: RL aerial (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 07:53:45 +0000; Hello Joe, I just simulated the antenna with MMANA-GAL and it resulted in Z = 1.57-j185.5 Ohm. So the antenna C would be about 1.8 nF. However a 50 uH loading coil point to 2.2 nF antenna capacitance; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00480.html (18,995 bytes)
3. Re: LF: RE: RL aerial (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 18:38:58 -0330 (NST); Hi Alan and Rik, Thanks for the comments. I was hoping to take advantage of the 'footprint' effect by the longer top loading, but it seems this may be pulling down Rrad. Perhaps some pruning may be i; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2015-01/msg00485.html (11,931 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]