Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Near\s+field\s+of\s+9kHz\s+antenna\s+II\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Near\s+field\s+of\s+9kHz\s+antenna\s+II\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: RE: Near field of 9kHz antenna II (score: 1): Author: "Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 21:11:28 +0100; Andy G4JNT Andy, why don't you try Messrs Hately/Khabbary? Seems they're the only ones who REALLY understand what radio propagation's all about - see their latest ad in "Radcom"......................; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00102.html (8,783 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: Near field of 9kHz antenna II (score: 1): Author: "John Sexton" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 12:23:26 -0700 (PDT); Hi Andy, I can manage the maths, although the arithmetic always seems to go wrong, but not being a radio engineer, the formulae are not very familiar. Can you point me to a good source. John, G4CNN O; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00120.html (9,837 bytes)
3. LF: RE: Near field of 9kHz antenna II (score: 1): Author: "Andrew Talbot" <[email protected]>; Date: 13 Jul 2001 15:52:55 +0100; Obviously not 1/R^6 roll off then !!! Looking at the figures for 1km and 2km it appears to be more like 1/R^2 which is the rate of the radiation field decay - surely the H field should fall off faste; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00121.html (8,950 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]