Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Loops\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+Loops\s+again\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: Loops again (score: 1): Author: "WE0H" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 17:27:18 -0600; Bill Ashlock in the US. He is an intelligent engineer and very generous. I will forward your message to him so he can get back with you. http://www.we0h.us/lf Mike, I must have missed something, who; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00086.html (13,918 bytes)
2. LF: RE: Loops again (score: 1): Author: "WE0H" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2002 17:25:14 -0600; You got that right Mike. Everyone has their favorite antenna and more power to them for using it. http://www.we0h.us/lf The article I mentioned does say that electrically tiny loops are inefficient -; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00087.html (10,670 bytes)
3. LF: Re: Loops again (score: 1): Author: "Steve Thompson" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 24 Dec 2002 08:27:05 +0100; With all the loop talk that has been going on since before time began has anyone found a design for a near perfect small loop, suppose its like how long is a piece of string, obviously the bigger the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-12/msg00112.html (9,917 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]