Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+73k\s+Beacon\s+\-\s+SM6LKM\s+on\s+80m\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+73k\s+Beacon\s+\-\s+SM6LKM\s+on\s+80m\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Re: 73k Beacon - SM6LKM on 80m (score: 1): Author: "Johan Bodin" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:54:09 +0100; Hi Jim, I also saw SM6LKM's 80m signals, about 5-6 Hz above the nominal frequency, thanks for the report! the lines were quite fuzzy, whether due to propagation or TX I don't know. The TX is not fuzz; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00075.html (8,654 bytes)
2. LF: RE: 73k Beacon - SM6LKM on 80m (score: 1): Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 14:01:11 +0100; Read the article on Dopplergrams by G3PLX in RadCom three or four years ago ... There is likely to be several Hz of Doppler shift on that frequency at night time. Guess who forgot that simple fact la; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-11/msg00092.html (9,868 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]