Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+630m\s+band\s+Wikipedia\s+site\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+RE\:\s+630m\s+band\s+Wikipedia\s+site\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: RE: 630m band Wikipedia site (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 09:21:44 +0000; Stefan, all, why 630m band ? Of course I know 600m = 500kHz, but we (hams) always tend to use round number, eg: 7MHz = 40m band and not 42m band (40m wavelenght = 7.5MHz). The only HF band where the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00501.html (9,783 bytes)
2. Re: LF: RE: 630m band Wikipedia site (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2012 11:45:03 +0200; Hi Rik, It wasn't my idea to call it 630m band. But i find the name useful. You also say 160m band and not 200m band. And you say 2200m band, not 2 km band. I think 2 significant numbers and 0 are co; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-06/msg00623.html (10,304 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]