Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Puckeridge\s+test\s+3\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Puckeridge\s+test\s+3\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Puckeridge test 3 (score: 1): Author: "Dick Rollema" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 12:02:37 +0200; From PA0SE Dick and all. Very puzzling! I worked Jim straight after you and found exactly the opposite..... 4dB better on the "small" antenna. We tried the test twice and I continued to listen, each; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00308.html (10,959 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Puckeridge test 3 (score: 1): Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 21 May 2000 16:28:15 +0000; Dave and All, There is a simple explanation. I was very busy doing the measurements, changing the receiver input from aerial to signal generator and back, reading levels etc. I therefore did not lis; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00312.html (11,191 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]