Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Proposed\s+new\s+LF\s+signal\s+format\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Proposed\s+new\s+LF\s+signal\s+format\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Proposed new LF signal format (score: 1): Author: "Andre' Kesteloot" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:24:38 -0500; [...] The WOLF signal is BPSK (at MS100), [...] Comments and suggestions welcome. 73, Stewart KK7KA Stewart is to be commended for developing the very interesting WOLF concept. One of the challenges; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00108.html (10,261 bytes)
2. LF: Proposed new LF signal format (score: 1): Author: "Stewart Nelson" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 06:53:46 -0800; I believe that, by using a signal format designed specifically for LF weak-signal operation, it should be possible to communicate at S/N values at least 10 dB below what is typically needed for QRSS.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00144.html (13,676 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]