Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Osc\s+drift\s+$TCXO$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Osc\s+drift\s+$TCXO$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Osc drift (TCXO) (score: 1): Author: José Manuel <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 15:37:38 +0100; Hi All again: Note about TCXO and DTCXO. 73, José - EA1PX http://www.temex-components.com/temex/technote/dctcxo.html -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] [email protected] To: rsgb_lf; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00008.html (10,352 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Osc drift (TCXO) (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sat, 30 Nov 2002 08:33:18 EST; Hi, In a message dated 11/29/02 7:03:23 PM GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Layout of the IIG oscillator/synthesizer board is quite different from the II, also the TCXO for the IIG is muc; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-11/msg00010.html (8,511 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]