Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Opera\s+8\s+versus\s+32\s+SNR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Opera\s+8\s+versus\s+32\s+SNR\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Opera 8 versus 32 SNR (score: 1): Author: Albert <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 21:43:25 +0100; Mike, Andy Food for thought TX driver via att 120 dB to SDR RX brick wall filter @ 2.5kHz. resulting in: 20:30 136 PA0A Op32 +3 dB 0 km @ 000 19:54 136 PA0A Op8 +4 dB 0 km @ 000 Albert, PA0A Attachme; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00509.html (10,498 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Opera 8 versus 32 SNR (score: 1): Author: Albert <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 22:41:32 +0100; Op 20-1-2012 21:58, Andy Talbot schreef: That's more like what we'd expect. So... it looks as if there's something in Mike's suggestion about th way the noise is measured is suspect. and we shouldn't; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg00817.html (11,353 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Opera 8 versus 32 SNR (score: 1): Author: Andy Talbot <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 20:58:35 +0000; That's more like what we'd expect. So... it looks as if there's something in Mike's suggestion about th way the noise is measured is suspect. and we shouldn't put too much faith into the S/N value sh; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-01/msg01070.html (11,229 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]