Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+OP8\s+vs\.\s+WSPR\s+in\s+4X\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+OP8\s+vs\.\s+WSPR\s+in\s+4X\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: OP8 vs. WSPR in 4X (score: 1): Author: Chris 4X1RF <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 20:36:03 +0200; Ok Stefan Yes that was 3 months ago ! I think it came as a surprise to many 136 operators , that the band was 'open' A OP32 run might decode into the Pacific as well as; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00058.html (14,790 bytes)
2. LF: OP8 vs. WSPR in 4X (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 14:26:24 +0200; Hi G.., Yes, maybe worth to compare! Good idea. Chris/4X1RF: Are you arround here? Do we want to make such a test this evening? OP8 vs. WSPR in 4X? 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 22.10.2012 01:51, schrieb Graha; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00187.html (12,149 bytes)
3. Re: LF: OP8 vs. WSPR in 4X (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 19:58:49 +0100; Can only do but try , over 10 dB was quite a margin , may reach inland usa as well now ? vx9bdq is nearly on the east coast on 500 .... which poses the question , is OP8 viable on 500 , taking the qs; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00324.html (15,753 bytes)
4. Re: LF: OP8 vs. WSPR in 4X (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 16:25:24 +0100; Ok Stefan Yes that was 3 months ago ! I think it came as a surprise to many 136 operators , that the band was 'open' A OP32 run might decode into the Pacific as well as over the pole ... as long as n; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-10/msg00456.html (13,490 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]