Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Not\s+very\s+stable\s+now\s+at\s+8970\.000\s+Hz\.\s+$\~\s+0\.001\s+Hz$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Not\s+very\s+stable\s+now\s+at\s+8970\.000\s+Hz\.\s+$\~\s+0\.001\s+Hz$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 11:07:17 +0000; Hi Peter / Uwe Maybe that explains why when I ran my my Grabber yesterday I could detect nothing. I haven't been running any 8.9KHz for a while as my WSPR on 474KHz makes a mess. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 20; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00185.html (11,304 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 15:01:56 +0000; Uwe Looking good in the UK today too. http://www.g3zjo.talktalk.net/vlfgrabber.htm 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 22/03/2013 09:16, PA1SDB, Peter wrote: Uwe, Looks stable and very strong over the night. That step; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00330.html (17,950 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 13:30:58 +0100; Hello Wolf, Sorry for Re: delay. Thank you for the Examples. Besides in buttons is the Noise now also visible in my screencapture info. 73's, Peter PA1SDB -- Original Message -- From: dl4yhf@freenet.; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00351.html (19,014 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 13:54:05 +0100; Hi Peter, To get a numeric indication of the noise floor, I suggest to use the lower-quartile algorithm. In SL, you would also define the frequency range in which to measure the noise. You can put th; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00506.html (18,551 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) (score: 1): Author: g3zjo <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 18:09:35 +0000; I have turned it off again now, the noise level is very high (snow,blizzard conditions) I am also running 474kHz WSPR again. I will fire up again tomorrow. When I first activated this morning you wer; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00567.html (10,840 bytes)
6. LF: Not very stable now at 8970.000 Hz. (~ 0.001 Hz) (score: 1): Author: "PA1SDB, Peter" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 07:29:52 +0100; Hello Uwe, Your signal is not very stable now. www.qsl.net/pa1sdb It feels not good to me to complain about 0.001 Hz drift, but I hope you understand when you take a look at my grabber ;-) Thanks any; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-03/msg00702.html (10,670 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]