Actually no need to inform about it, because everyone seems to be QRV now :-) Anyway, the hell is going on on MF WSPR! Got decodes by 71 stations in the last 2 weeks and 47 in the last 24 hours. Need
Hi All, while I’m not renowned for having the most efficient or qro MF station, I have noticed that 472 is not as good for range, for me at least, as 500 was. I used to be able to be spotted
Hi Rik, That would explain quite a bit then, esp as my vertical is very short at about 8m long. Top wire is about 35m long, so well in the “sub-optimal” band! I’m going to do some
This is also the case here. Hence I'm quite happy with the frequency move. I believe it's just the poor conditions these days why we don't make it over the pond or vice versa. 73 Clemens DL4RAJ
Hello Jim, over the past weeks I completed my new rig, that can be used to transmit on 501 and 472 kHz (we still have the 501-504 kHz segment available in Belgium). In theory the radiation resistance
Oh I'm not complaining, just had noticed that my qrp earth heater was more effective! Lol This is also the case here. Hence I'm quite happy with the frequency move. I believe it's just the poor condi
Im sure the band was in better shape in those days ? G,) 2009-03-25 00:56 G0NBD 0.503938 -23 0 IO83lk +13 0.020 AA1A FN42pb 5012 3114 2009-03-25 00:56 G0NBD 0.503937 -23 0 IO83lk +13 0.020 DJ6YD JO42
This was -21 090325 0050 9 -21 1.5 0.503938 G0NBD IO83 13 Hello Graham, You still had 10 DBs to spare for a decode!!! Try 2 milliwatts... Looks like 155,700 miles per watt... Good on ya... PSE QSL VI
Hi Jim, But, now you're heating the earth more effective! :-) 73, Stefan/DK7FC Am 06.10.2013 14:28, schrieb James Cowburn: Oh I'm not complaining, just had noticed that my qrp earth heater was more e
