Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+MF\,\s+center\s+of\s+activity\s+QRG\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+MF\,\s+center\s+of\s+activity\s+QRG\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: MF, center of activity QRG (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 14:20:38 +0300; Hello Stefan, MF Previously I did quite a lot of listening between 472 and 479 kHz due to the new (and final) allocation proposal. Back then my own conclusion was that 472.5 kHz +/- would be the idea; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-07/msg00275.html (12,861 bytes)
2. LF: MF, center of activity QRG (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 12:24:40 +0200; Hi Edgar, MF I've often seen activity on 472.6 kHz on the DM4TR grabber. But why 472.6 and not 472.5 kHz? Sould be no problem for a 500 Hz CW filter but if people use a narrow filter, maybe 150 Hz BW; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-07/msg00626.html (11,844 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]