Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Lowfer\'s\s+Net\s+\-\s+sunday\s+12\s+december\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 07:36:55 -0800 (PST)
Hi Dave, G3YXM, Just to finish our brief discussion yesterday on the Lowfer's Net, my reason for trying a transmitting loop first is so that I can operate on both HF and LF without having to put up t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00051.html (10,948 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 19:13:04 +0000
Re-A single ant to use on all bands. Don't do it, especially on VLF. Use a single antenna for each band. It is difficult enough to get max efficiency on 136 using an antenna specifically built for th
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00054.html (12,135 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december (score: 1)
Author: "Dave" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 13 Dec 1999 21:23:00 +0100
John and Mal Mal wrote... . A tooth brush would cost more and melt down at about 11 watts when dry, and less when wet. One mustn't let the facts get in the way of a good opinion I suppose... It's jus
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00057.html (9,455 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december (score: 1)
Author: "malcolmg3kev" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 14 Dec 1999 18:54:41 +0000
Re - experimenters band. The Broadcaster fraternity and Admirality engineers pioneered, and have been using the Low frequencies for 50 years very successfuly. We Radio Amateurs in 1999 are merely re-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00060.html (10,280 bytes)

5. Re: LF: Lowfer's Net - sunday 12 december (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 1999 11:54:51
Uhm ... with the attitude that the 'commercials' and 'proffessionals' do everything better and the we 'poor amateurs' shouldn't try anything else, we would still be using AM instead of SSB, would nev
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-12/msg00064.html (10,983 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu