Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Loop\s+vs\.\s+ferrite\s+antenna\s+tests\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Loop\s+vs\.\s+ferrite\s+antenna\s+tests\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 05:32:59 -0700 (PDT); Hello Stefan, LF, I'm looking for a suitable preamp for my "coming sooner or later" tunable ferrite antenna (hopefully covering as much as possible of LF band with a var. cap. plus some switchable ad; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00155.html (14,938 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: Piotr Mlynarski <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:15:50 +0200; W dniu 2011-09-05 14:32, Daniele Tincani pisze: Hello Stefan, LF, I'm looking for a suitable preamp for my "coming sooner or later" tunable ferrite antenna (hopefully covering as much as possible of; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00188.html (12,892 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: "James Moritz" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:21:26 +0100; Dear Daniele, LF Group, The high-impedance buffer type of loop preamp as I used with my ferrite rod is probably the best choice for your experiments - it has a number of advantages: Low noise - for l; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00361.html (12,606 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: Tony Magon <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 01:23:11 +1000; Hello Daniele, Am 05.09.2011 14:32, schrieb Daniele Tincani: Hello Stefan, LF, I'm looking for a suitable preamp for my "coming sooner or later" tunable ferrite antenna (hopefully covering as mu; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00381.html (15,618 bytes)
5. LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 14:21:10 +0200; LF, There was no chance for me to TX in France this year but at least i did some useful comparisons with my single turn loop (1m diameter) and the ferrite antenna. Markus/DF6NM did some CW beacon tra; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00421.html (12,070 bytes)
6. Re: LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 17:00:49 +0200; Hello Daniele, Am 05.09.2011 14:32, schrieb Daniele Tincani: Hello Stefan, LF, I'm looking for a suitable preamp for my "coming sooner or later" tunable ferrite antenna (hopefully covering as much as; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00610.html (15,331 bytes)
7. Re: LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2011 21:10:36 +0200; Hi Tony, It was posted here (24th August). I attach M0BMUs schematic in this mail. His 50 Ohm based preamp is available somewhere in the web and in my dropbox at http://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/M; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00617.html (16,850 bytes)
8. Re: LF: Loop vs. ferrite antenna tests... (score: 1): Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2011 21:49:14 +0100 (BST); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00622.html (13,896 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]