Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Loop\s+TX\s+antennas\s+at\s+VLF\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Loop\s+TX\s+antennas\s+at\s+VLF\.\.\.\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF... (score: 1): Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 04:30:19 -0700; Hi Rik Thanks for this! I may be comparing apples to oranges alittle (maybe alot). The loop I have would only require a 1.8uF cap and this coupled with a higher Q makes for a little dicier tuning sce; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00161.html (18,166 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF... (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:41:59 +0100; Hi Scott, I have some comments, yes. I would try not to resonate the PA but drive it with a H bridge PA that can handle pretty much reactive power. If you think about Rik's and Jim's calculation and; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00344.html (19,597 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF... (score: 1): Author: Scott Tilley <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 21:39:02 -0700; But, unfortunately, i think there is another problem: If you try that with your loop, who will be the next receiving station? What distance? Even if you run 100A rms into that loop (BTW, what is the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00462.html (12,436 bytes)
4. RE: LF: Loop TX antennas at VLF... (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2011 09:10:34 +0100; But, unfortunately, i think there is another problem: If you try that with your loop, who will be the next receiving station? What distance? Even if you run 100A rms into that loop (BTW, what is the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-03/msg00873.html (13,761 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]