Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+License\s+for\s+below\s+9\s+kHz\!\!\!\!\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+License\s+for\s+below\s+9\s+kHz\!\!\!\!\!\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: License for below 9 kHz!!!!! (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 09:08:56; There is no requirement for any for of authorization below 9 kHz in Canada, this is why the work I did last winter was at 8.998 kHz. Same situation in Belgium : via our society (UBA) the question wa; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00129.html (10,741 bytes)
2. Re: LF: License for below 9 kHz!!!!! (score: 1): Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 23:33:04 -0400; Tom: So below 9 kHz is not a free-bander-area, it has to be still 'administrated'. Interesting point however About this point Tom we start planning another Bastille Day......... Larry VA3LK; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00130.html (9,279 bytes)
3. Re: LF: License for below 9 kHz!!!!! (score: 1): Author: "Tom" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 13 Jul 01 00:16:43 GMT; RR 444: Administrations authorizing the use of frequencies below 9 kHz shall ensure taht no harmful interference is caused therby to the services to which the bands above 9 kHz are allocated (see RR; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00131.html (10,331 bytes)
4. LF: License for below 9 kHz!!!!! (score: 1): Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 18:56:33 -0400; Greetings: There is no requirement for any for of authorization below 9 kHz in Canada, this is why the work I did last winter was at 8.998 kHz. I might have it wrong but I suspect the ITU does not go; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-07/msg00132.html (9,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]