Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+LOC\s+G3WSC\/P\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+LOC\s+G3WSC\/P\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: LOC G3WSC/P (score: 1): Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 13:14:16 +0000; GPS calc. G3KEV- IO94SH --G3WSC/P- IO91XS--AZ 175, DISTANCE 287.3 Kms G3KEV- IO94SH -- MM0ALM- IO87UA--AZ 340, DISTANCE 320.8 Kms MM0ALM is 2db stronger and a clean signal. G3WSC/P has key clicks on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00136.html (8,140 bytes)
2. Re: LF: LOC G3WSC/P (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:32:06 +0100; G3KEV- IO94SH --G3WSC/P- IO91XS--AZ 175, DISTANCE 287.3 Kms G3KEV- IO94SH -- MM0ALM- IO87UA--AZ 340, DISTANCE 320.8 Kms MM0ALM is 2db stronger de G3KEV/SCARBOROUGH. So, if both MM0ALM and G3WSC were; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00172.html (8,676 bytes)
3. Re: LF: LOC G3WSC/P (score: 1): Author: Väinö Lehtoranta <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:05:55 +0300; Actually no reason to interfere in these discussions, but as late as in 1960's, I unambiguously refused to believe that measuring pure ground wave field strength can be so demanding, (not to talk abo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00180.html (10,264 bytes)
4. Re: LF: LOC G3WSC/P (score: 1): Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:59:26 +0000; So, if both MM0ALM and G3WSC were running 1W ERP, this completely destroys the argument that higher antennas always work better for the same ERP! Mike. Speculation again. Do you know exactly the par; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-04/msg00184.html (10,295 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]