Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+LF\s+antenna\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Fausto Coletti" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Jan 2011 18:43:32 +0100
Hi All, today I did the first reception test with a matched antenna. I have spread about 150 meter of wire (four wires) sloping from the top of my tower up to about 3 meter off the ground and with an
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-01/msg00404.html (10,092 bytes)

2. LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2000 15:31:38
Over the last weeks I noticed that Werner, ON6ND, always got a +/- 10dB better report from UK stations. The fact that he is about 70km closer to the UK may take 2dB. From his antenna details I could
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00014.html (12,374 bytes)

3. Re: LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 10:36:46 EST
<< Basicaly a 'top inductance' reduces the voltage on the vertical part of the antenna. Assuming that the losses induced in surrounding objects (ground, houses, trees, etc...) affect mainly the elect
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00015.html (8,757 bytes)

4. LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "'Geri' Kinzel, DK8KW" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2000 13:45:46 -0500
Hello Rik (and all the others) Any comments ?< your findings are supporting the effect of Peter's (DF3LP) birchtree-antenna, who also has a big top load and is a record holder of all the the DL "firs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00017.html (8,578 bytes)

5. Re: LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2000 19:37:30 +0000
ON7YD wrote: A bit desperate I started my final attempt, again inspired by Mike, G3XDV, who reported an improvement of his antenna by adding some inductance at the top of the vertical section of his
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00062.html (12,038 bytes)

6. Re: LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 13:44:23 +1300
G3XDV, the about a S-point stronger, but that could be be it signals the showed an Very interested in this report from Rik. At the time I announced my success, Rik spent some time running through the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00065.html (12,935 bytes)

7. Re: LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2000 09:57:26 +0000
ZL2CA wrote: The practical disadvantages of an elevated loading coil are mechanical support needed, and it surviving high voltages on transmit, during wet or humid weather. I am not a supporter of us
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00068.html (10,749 bytes)

8. Re: LF: LF antenna (score: 1)
Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2000 11:48:20
At 19:37 8/01/00 +0000, G3XDV wrote: A bit desperate I started my final attempt, again inspired by Mike, G3XDV, who reported an improvement of his antenna by adding some inductance at the top of the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00083.html (10,347 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu