Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+LF\s+RX\s+loop\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+LF\s+RX\s+loop\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: LF RX loop (score: 1): Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:31:34 -0700 (PDT); Hello Stefan, as far as I know, you should avoid loading a resonant loop too much so I would say that a preamp with an high input impedance is better (so no 50 ohms load at the transformer output in; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00328.html (13,308 bytes)
2. LF: LF RX loop (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 14:40:07 +0200; LF, Some questions about RX loops for LF. Yesterday i found a shortcut between my loop ends. Thus i haven't found a resonance when varying the C. It is a single turn circular loop using copper tube w; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00331.html (11,433 bytes)
3. Re: LF: LF RX loop (score: 1): Author: Daniele Tincani <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2011 06:34:51 -0700 (PDT); Apologies for re-sending this message, first time I selected the "Send" button by mistake :-) I wanted to add just a couple of general-interest references for loop antennas: http://www.frontiernet.ne; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-06/msg00393.html (13,951 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]