Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+HF

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+HF_MF2LF\s+\#1\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: Ed Lesnichy <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 12:40:44 +0300; Dear LF enthusiasts, the prospective time-table of HF_MF2LF #1 experiment Feb 4 : PART 1 start 13z - end 1730z HF freq: TX1 14350 kHz, TX2 14213.681 kHz (14350 - 14213.681 = 136.319) RX freq: 136.319; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00342.html (11,786 bytes)
2. Re: LF: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:02:58 +0100; Dear LF enthusiasts, the prospective time-table of HF_MF2LF #1 experiment Feb 4 : PART 1 start 13z - end 1730z HF freq: TX1 14350 kHz, TX2 14213.681 kHz (14350 - 14213.681 = 136.319) RX freq: 136.31; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00349.html (12,433 bytes)
3. Re: LF: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 04 Feb 2006 16:24:49 +0000; Hi Ed and group, been watching 136.319 kHz for a few hours now - nothing yet. But your HF signal is very strong at the moment, though there seems to be a varying difference between the two frequencie; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00369.html (11,302 bytes)
4. Re: LF: HF_MF2LF #1 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 01:27:03 +0100; Hi Ed, nothing seen here in jo43sv. used different aerials and SpecLab in split mode. the signs on 14MHZ, 3,6MHz, 1,8MHz were strong. regards Uwe/dj8wx Dear LF enthusiasts, the prospective time-table; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2006-02/msg00382.html (12,284 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]