Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+GRABBER\s+SPEED\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+GRABBER\s+SPEED\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: GRABBER SPEED (score: 1): Author: "mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 17:44:38 +0100; Turn the speed up boys for the majority, who are cw operators. Look at the OHIO grabber in NDB cw mode, it works well for the cw man. I seldom use grabbers because I usually get replies to my cq's fr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00003.html (7,793 bytes)
2. Re: LF: GRABBER SPEED (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 05 Jan 2008 22:02:09 +0100; Good point John, But, personally I could not see the point of a grabber on 80 meter's ? G .. I look forward to seeing your grabber come online soon to allow the rest of us to read 20wpm CW by eye, in; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00419.html (10,395 bytes)
3. Re: LF: GRABBER SPEED (score: 1): Author: John Pumford-Green GM4SLV <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 5 Jan 2008 20:18:19 +0000; No, for the reasons explained in a previous posting to the list. Personally speaking, my grabber isn't intended to allow remote stations to follow CW QSOs by eye via the internet, it is there to prov; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2008-01/msg00538.html (9,132 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]