Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+GPS\-Disciplined\s+BPSK\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. SV: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Johan Bodin" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:57:55 +0100
Hi I checked with Garmin on this and they're standing by their 1 microsecond spec. They suggest using the GPS25-LVS (which apparently has a mode where you can specify that the location is fixed and l
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00314.html (10,527 bytes)

2. Re: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Bill de Carle" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:47:56 -0500
...............I propose to use GPS ..........: The only real requirement is a GPS receiver with a 1-PPS output good to within a few microseconds of UTC. Be careful - don't confuse relative with abs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00322.html (10,098 bytes)

3. Re: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Vernall" <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:34:16 +1300
Why not use the signal from one of the LF time clocks, and correct by offsetting the distance. That assumes there is available coverage from a terrestrial transmitter with time information. GPS is g
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00331.html (9,450 bytes)

4. Re: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew Talbot" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:21:19 +0100
The GPS25 module - one of those recommended by TAPR for the "GPS Disciplined Frequency Standard" - is specified as having a 1 PPS output accurate to within 1 microsecond of UTC. Additionally, it is s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00341.html (11,559 bytes)

5. Re: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Bill de Carle" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:43:22 -0500
...............I propose to use GPS ..........: The only real requirement is a GPS receiver with a 1-PPS output good to within a few microseconds of UTC. Be careful - don't confuse relative with abs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00344.html (10,006 bytes)

6. Re: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "PY3CRX PY2PLL" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:19:33 -0300
This would seem to need much less engineering than processing the output of a GPS. Stewart G3YSX I can detect 60KHz from WWVB, but useless to lock anything ... so ... I use a Furuno OEM module, that
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00346.html (11,234 bytes)

7. Re: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Stewart Bryant" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:54:40 +0000
Why not use the signal from one of the LF time clocks, and correct by offsetting the distance. Since this is being used for LF transmission, the communications system must be propagation phase change
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00348.html (11,477 bytes)

8. Re: LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:28:49 +0000
...............I propose to use GPS ..........: The only real requirement is a GPS receiver with a 1-PPS output good to within a few microseconds of UTC. Be careful - don't confuse relative with abs
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00353.html (11,362 bytes)

9. LF: GPS-Disciplined BPSK (score: 1)
Author: "Bill de Carle" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 16:17:21 -0500
Hello everyone, It has long been recognized that establishing bit-sync and frame-sync is difficult with current implementations of BPSK whenever there is marginal copy and the signal only comes up ou
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00370.html (13,329 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu