Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DCF39\s+frequency\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+DCF39\s+frequency\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: DCF39 frequency (score: 1): Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:35:54 -0800 (PST); Hi Peter, The station that is operating is actually DBF39. DCF39 is not in operation. The frequency is 138.820 when not sending data and and spreads up to 139.170 when transmitting data. 73, John, G4; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00374.html (8,095 bytes)
2. Re: LF: DCF39 frequency (score: 1): Author: "Ko Versteeg" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 14:33:18 +0100; I always believed the signal was on 138830 kHz precisely. a couple of recent postings have quoted the frequency as 138820 kHz. could you please advise the current precise frequency many thanks peter; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00382.html (8,420 bytes)
3. LF: DCF39 frequency (score: 1): Author: "Peter Cleall" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 11:59:22 +0100; I am using DCF39 to set the calibration of my rx and argo. I always believed the signal was on 138830 kHz precisely. a couple of recent postings have quoted the frequency as 138820 kHz. could you ple; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00386.html (7,886 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]