Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Countries\s+MF\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: "mal hamilton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 17:53:50 +0100
MF Since 1st Jan 2013 the following countries have been worked on CW. DL, EI0, OK2, OM1, PA3, GW4, GI4, HB9, LA9, S57. Lots of others have been worked from the same countries. Looking out for DX cont
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00058.html (8,791 bytes)

2. Re: LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: "Federico" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 14:26:42 +0100
Same antenna's ????. A antenna per band? 73 de Federico EA2HB another try: 3 technical / scientific reasons to say it is one band: - frequencies are only 6% apart (only 4% if you take 501/479) - same
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00225.html (14,494 bytes)

3. Re: LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:00:37 +0100
5.2585 to 5.4065 MHz = the 'Band' The sub groups are 11 = individual band segments. the 'BAND' is still defined as 5.2585 to 5.4065 MHz Good try , but still the same :( G::) -- From: "Rik Strobbe" <R
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00281.html (12,476 bytes)

4. Re: LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:40:38 +0100
Would be so , if there where not for band edges being defined In this case, the qso took place inside each others band edges , so its defiantly cross band G :) Hi Tony, I would call our QSO not as x-
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00319.html (11,123 bytes)

5. RE: LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 21:40:57 +0000
so in the UK you have 11 ham bands between 5258.5 and 5406.5kHz ;-) See http://www.rsgb.org/committees/spectrumforum/operating-on-5mhz-in-the-uk.php 73, Rik ON7YD - OR7T _____________________________
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00416.html (12,161 bytes)

6. Re: LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:16:42 +0100
So far I've worked in CW: G, GI, GW, EI, SM, PA, OK, OM, DL, HB9, S57, YO, and ON (X-Band 500kHz), F and OH (X-Band 3.5 MHz) Where are the stations from OZ, LA and GM? 73 de HB9ASB Am 20.01.2013 17:2
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00533.html (9,279 bytes)

7. RE: LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 18:45:09 +0000
Hi Tony, I would call our QSO not as x-band but just split-frequency. 501kHz and 472kHz is just a ratio of 1.06 (or 6% apart). To compare: 160m (1810-2000kHz) has a ratio of 1.10, 80m (3500-3800) has
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00589.html (10,568 bytes)

8. RE: LF: Countries MF (score: 1)
Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 08:03:08 +0000
another try: 3 technical / scientific reasons to say it is one band: - frequencies are only 6% apart (only 4% if you take 501/479) - same antenna's, same equipment used - propagation will hardly diff
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00740.html (13,961 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu