Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Comparison\s+of\s+FFTDSP4\s+and\s+Specrogram\s+5\.09\s+on\s+QRS\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Comparison\s+of\s+FFTDSP4\s+and\s+Specrogram\s+5\.09\s+on\s+QRS\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Comparison of FFTDSP4 and Specrogram 5.09 on QRS (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:41:54 +0100; COMPARISON OF FFTDSP4y AND SPECTROGRAM 5.09 with some comments on HAMVIEW Having installed what I think is probably the latest of the Spectrogram upgrades, 5.09, I have arranged the two aux. audio ou; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00136.html (14,357 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Comparison of FFTDSP4 and Specrogram 5.09 on QRS (score: 1): Author: "Clifford Buttschardt" <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:33:40 -0700 (PDT); Alan, your note comparing the these two programs was most valuable. Even though we can not join you on 136 KHz due to a strong US Navy station here in California, there are many other times when the; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00137.html (8,826 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Comparison of FFTDSP4 and Specrogram 5.09 on QRS (score: 1): Author: "Peter W. Schnoor" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 02:16:37 +0200; Hello Group, Hi Alan, May be that it could be of interest to have an impression how I'm working here 8-) In conclusion, I still like FFTDSP4 as an operating aid. I find that on a full scan 200-2500Hz; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-08/msg00139.html (11,418 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]