Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CW\s+beacon\s+in\s+LF\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CW\s+beacon\s+in\s+LF\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: CW beacon in LF (score: 1): Author: VIGILANT Luis Fernández <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:12:38 +0000; Hi LF With the goal of rising interest in the band I plan to run a CW beacon next month for Christmas Will be very hard to put an audible signal for those equiped with sub optimal receivers and of co; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00475.html (9,973 bytes)
2. Re: LF: CW beacon in LF (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:04:29 +0100; Am 21.11.2018 12:12, schrieb VIGILANT Luis Fernández: Question: Which would be a suitable frequency clear enough in central EU for those who can try ? 136.5 kHz or 136.8 kHz, that's quite in t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-11/msg00483.html (10,035 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]