Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CLASS\s+D\s+E\.\.\.\.\s+Instrumet\s+induced\s+errors\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CLASS\s+D\s+E\.\.\.\.\s+Instrumet\s+induced\s+errors\s+\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: CLASS D E.... Instrumet induced errors ? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 12:53:24 +0100; ..... The 'I' supply to the stage dosent look like a sine wave , more like a pulse train ? , thats the case will need a little more than a avo-8 to get the correct value, vlaues may be actually highe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00127.html (12,376 bytes)
2. Re: LF: CLASS D E.... Instrumet induced errors ? (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 16:51:21 +0100; It looks like you have a serious problem, sounds more like a Radar tx. The output from my class E is a beautiful sine wave, this is followed by a 5 pole LPF. For testing it is preferable to use a spe; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00264.html (12,711 bytes)
3. Re: LF: CLASS D E.... Instrumet induced errors ? (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 00:16:46 +0100; Thats the point, the out put is 'pure' no problem to measure , but the dc feed looks to be a 'complex' function ...any allowance made in the calc's , past P = I*V ? Same problem, pulsed radars are ve; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-11/msg00320.html (13,830 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]