Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CFH\s+$again\!$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+CFH\s+$again\!$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: CFH (again!) (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 07:41:55 +0100; From Dave G3YMC Mal yesterday and today gave a very detailed signal report on CFH during daylight hours, and his reports, in particular on hearing it at 1530 today, agree largely with the reception h; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00118.html (9,909 bytes)
2. Re: LF: CFH (again!) (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 11:17:18 +0100; G3YMC wrote: Mal mentions the problem of QRM from CFH - in case we hadn't noticed! I suggest that the Rugby transmitter on 73.4, which has more or less put an end to realistic QSOs on that band, is s; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00120.html (10,273 bytes)
3. Re: LF: CFH (again!) (score: 1): Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:05:52 -0800; No Windup. Its a reality if you need to use LMCW and Small Loop Antennas and Lemonade bottles for coil formers for local qso's its SYMPATHY you need. I strongly believe that the noise on the Rugby 73; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-01/msg00122.html (10,334 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]