Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Bandplans\s*$/>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Bandplans\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. LF: Bandplans (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1999 01:12:16 -0400; From Dave G3YMC Although I am in favour of keeping the top 100Hz or so of the band for slow CW, as per current usage, I do not think we should have any other sort of restrictive bandplanning. With cu; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-07/msg00043.html (9,148 bytes)
2. LF: Bandplans (score: 1): Author: "Dave Sergeant" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:36:32 +0100; From Dave G3YMC I agree with the comments of Rik and others that we should not be too restrictive on bandplanning, although accept that some form of planning is a good idea. With the use of specialis; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/1999-10/msg00149.html (8,483 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Bandplans (score: 1): Author: "Larry Kayser" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 08:36:35 -0500; Greetings Walter.... ............By all means let's have a RECOMMENDED bandplan but to start moaning when somebody occupies the "wrong" slot for an hour or two in an otherwise empty band is a bit ric; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00412.html (10,395 bytes)
4. LF: Bandplans (score: 1): Author: "Walter Blanchard" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 10:22:48 +0000; For Heaven's sake there's enough regulation and self-appointed policemen in this world without burdening ourselves with even more! By all means let's have a RECOMMENDED bandplan but to start moaning; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2002-01/msg00420.html (8,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]