Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Ballpark\s+L\s+\&\s+C\s+values\s+for\s+tuner\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+Ballpark\s+L\s+\&\s+C\s+values\s+for\s+tuner\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: Ballpark L & C values for tuner (score: 1): Author: "Johan H. Bodin" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 17:13:46 +0200; Yes, I have seen it before. That rule of thumb is near resonance with about 500 ohms of reactance (Xc = -j500.5 and Xl = +j471.2 ohms). If you replace 1 metre with 37 inches, the error will be less t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00037.html (10,398 bytes)
2. Re: LF: Ballpark L & C values for tuner (score: 1): Author: "Roelof Bakker" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 09:44:52 +0200; Hello Alan, No, I am not that old , really! 73, Roelof (build 11-1946); /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00183.html (9,620 bytes)
3. Re: LF: Ballpark L & C values for tuner (score: 1): Author: John Rabson <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 15:20:43 +0200; I haven't seen it before, but for 2200m you get C = 2.2nF and L = 550uH which seem about right. John F5VLF; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00339.html (9,754 bytes)
4. Re: LF: Ballpark L & C values for tuner (score: 1): Author: Roelof Bakker <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 13:27:51 +0000; Yes! A seasoned ham and avid home brewer told it to me 45 years ago! 73, Roelof Bakker, pa0rdt; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00387.html (9,503 bytes)
5. Re: LF: Ballpark L & C values for tuner (score: 1): Author: "Alan Melia" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 20:11:53 +0100; You sure the capacitance was not quoted in "jars" Roelof :-)) Alan G3NYK; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00525.html (11,064 bytes)
6. LF: Ballpark L & C values for tuner (score: 1): Author: John Bruce McCreath <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 08:44:54 -0400; Hi LFers, I stumbled upon an interesting tidbit of info yesterday which I'd not seen before. Regarding ballpark figures for the L and C values required for an AMU, the following was suggested: For C; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00696.html (9,520 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]