Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+Who\s+was\s+it\s+on\s+137\.500\s+kHz\s+today\s+\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+Who\s+was\s+it\s+on\s+137\.500\s+kHz\s+today\s+\?\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. LF: AW: Who was it on 137.500 kHz today ? (score: 1): Author: "( UM, 300b) v. Wedelstädt, Eberhard" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 08:57:52 +0100; Greetings and a happy new year to all i was it on 137,500, but the power adsorb in wet trees around the antenna next time on 137,500 up ? Regards, Eberhard, DL3ZID --Ursprüngliche Nachricht-- Von: Wo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-01/msg00041.html (9,754 bytes)
2. Re: LF: AW: Who was it on 137.500 kHz today ? (score: 1): Author: Wolf DL4YHF <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 03 Jan 2005 13:17:21 +0100; Hello Eberhard, Thanks for the information and the call on 137.5 kHz on sunday. Better luck next time.. with less QRM/QRN on this side which made the receiver's AGC jump up and down, furthermore Lora; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2005-01/msg00044.html (9,434 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]