Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+RE\:\s+RE\:\s+W1VLF\s+9\s+Khz\s+Antenna\s+update\s+Putting\s+inductance\s+near\s+the\s+top\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+RE\:\s+RE\:\s+W1VLF\s+9\s+Khz\s+Antenna\s+update\s+Putting\s+inductance\s+near\s+the\s+top\.\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. LF: AW: RE: RE: W1VLF 9 Khz Antenna update Putting inductance near the top. (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:26:28 +0200; Hi Rik, I think on VLF it could be even useful to place the L as high as possible when there is "nothing" lossy in the near surrounding. I think the difference to LF is, that the coil losses on VLF c; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2010-04/msg00092.html (20,143 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]