Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+JT\-5\s+for\s+TA\s+DX\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+JT\-5\s+for\s+TA\s+DX\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: AW: JT-5 for TA DX? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 18:54:03 +0100; Aaaaaaah, very interesting! OK, that explains much :-) The loss is probably more than 3 dB then :-) I was receiving several decodes of SM6BHZ on 630m during the 10 minute gaps ;-) Thanks and 73! Stef; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00149.html (26,730 bytes)
2. Re: LF: AW: JT-5 for TA DX? (score: 1): Author: Stefan Schäfer <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2012 16:46:33 +0100; Hello Joe and Joe, Thank you for watching! The reports appear at least 10 dB to low, right? Someone from across the pond? I also got a single report from UA0SNV in OO17, 5750 km distance, http://dl.d; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00465.html (11,376 bytes)
3. LF: AW: JT-5 for TA DX? (score: 1): Author: "Joe" <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2012 07:59:52 +0100; Hi Stefan, Last night decodings in JT9-10 2250 10 -7 0.4 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 2330 10 -10 0.4 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN49IK 2340 10 -8 1.3 1436.06 0.00 PA0A JO33 0050 10 -4 0.9 1433.06 0.00 DK7FC JN; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2012-11/msg00688.html (10,077 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]