Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+82\.7kHz\s+CW\s+signal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+AW\:\s+82\.7kHz\s+CW\s+signal\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: AW: 82.7kHz CW signal (score: 1): Author: "Soegiono, Gamal" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 08:26:44 +0100; [Soegiono, Gamal] Hello Rik and all, RS> Some weeks ago someone (G3YXM ?) reported hearing Confirm receiption of a 2-tone FSK signal on 82k8 (approx) which just fits into 200 Hz of IF BW. According t; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00115.html (9,080 bytes)
2. Re: LF: AW: 82.7kHz CW signal (score: 1): Author: "g3kev" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 10 May 2000 17:00:26 +0000; [Soegiono, Gamal] Hello Rik and all, Confirm receiption of a 2-tone FSK signal on 82k8 (approx) which just fits into 200 Hz of IF BW. According to well informed ITU persons this might be (1) GYW on; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00131.html (9,930 bytes)
3. RE: LF: AW: 82.7kHz CW signal (score: 1): Author: "Talbot Andrew" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 11 May 2000 16:12:46 +0100; Just a thought. Who uses these transmissions at LF and why - especially from central London. The freq is to high for (alleged) underwater communications and doesn't offer much in the way of long dist; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2000-05/msg00139.html (8,892 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]