Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ANTS\:\s+Higher\s+L\s+\-\s+higher\s+ERP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+ANTS\:\s+Higher\s+L\s+\-\s+higher\s+ERP\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: ANTS: Higher L - higher ERP (score: 1): Author: "Holger 'Geri', DK8KW" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:21:33 -0500; I look forward to further discussion on exactly what theory fits this practical result. I don't think I can add a good portion of theory why it works, however, I can through my two cents into the di; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00093.html (9,748 bytes)
2. Re: LF: ANTS: Higher L - higher ERP (score: 1): Author: "Rik Strobbe" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 14:04:20; I can confirm the results that Mike got. Last year I added a 2mH loading coil at the top of my inverted L (at that time 11m high with a topload consisting of 3 parallel wires spaced 75cm and 25m long; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00094.html (10,301 bytes)
3. LF: ANTS: Higher L - higher ERP (score: 1): Author: "Mike Dennison" <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:39:50 +0100; OK on the elevated loading coil. I'm not convinced that hard results support your claims: Bob, I was confused by your reaction to my assertion that not only had my increased elevated inductance impr; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00095.html (18,020 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]