Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+500\s+v\s+136\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+500\s+v\s+136\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 500 v 136 (score: 1): Author: John GM4SLV <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 10:22:01 +0100 (BST); Unfortunately I think the ERP restriction on 100mW may be what drives the use of QRSS modes. Certainly from this QTH a lot of the active stations are over 900km away and QRSS gives much more chance o; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00415.html (11,806 bytes)
2. Re: LF: 500 v 136 (score: 1): Author: [email protected]; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 15:25:50 EDT; In a message dated 18/07/2007 19:38:30 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Hi All It looks like 500 is going the same way as 136. If Beacons and QRS are the trend then the band will fizzl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00416.html (8,883 bytes)
3. LF: 500 v 136 (score: 1): Author: "hamilton mal" <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 20:49:09 +0100; Hi All It looks like 500 is going the same way as 136. If Beacons and QRS are the trend then the band will fizzle out when the novelty wears off. QRS does little to encourage improving antennas or mo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00417.html (8,466 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]