Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+500\s+\-\s+BAND\s+PLAN\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 500 - BAND PLAN (score: 1)
Author: "Gw3UEP" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 04:13:49 +0100
Common sense. 1] Sure, keep the digi/pc/auto modes >503. 2] Don't create a minefield for newcomers - this control-freak stuff is a real turn-off. 3] Let's get on with experiments & qso's. Rog. -- Ori
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00038.html (10,264 bytes)

2. Re: LF: 500 - BAND PLAN (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 11:55:17 EDT
In a message dated 27/07/2007 13:07:08 GMT Standard Time, [email protected] writes: Sorry chaps, This seems to escalating out of all proportion, yet more over-regulation - KISS! Rog. And your construc
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00039.html (8,827 bytes)

3. Re: LF: 500 - BAND PLAN (score: 1)
Author: "Tom Boucher" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 14:24:20 +0100
Afraid I agree with Roger - it hardly qualifies as a 'band' anyway! Beacons are useful when the frequency is sparsely populated as it is currently. At evenings/week ends, let's just be aware that the
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00040.html (14,365 bytes)

4. Re: LF: 500 - BAND PLAN (score: 1)
Author: "Gw3UEP" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:02:59 +0100
Sorry chaps, This seems to escalating out of all proportion, yet more over-regulation - KISS! Rog. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] [email protected] To: [email protected] rsgb_lf_gr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00041.html (12,940 bytes)

5. Re: LF: 500 - BAND PLAN (score: 1)
Author: [email protected]
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 05:45:08 EDT
Hello Chris / group. Thank you for the proposed band plan. Looks very sensible. I suspect that as 500kHz continues to evolve, use of the different modes will experience peaks and troughs in their pop
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00042.html (11,919 bytes)

6. Re: LF: 500 - BAND PLAN (score: 1)
Author: Alan Ibbetson <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:25:54 +0100
Yes, this works for me. Thanks for taking the initiative. 73, Alan. Obviously an ideal band plan would benefit as many stations as possible to the inconvenience of as few as possible. There seems to
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00043.html (10,303 bytes)

7. LF: 500 - BAND PLAN (score: 1)
Author: CHRISTOPHER OSBORN <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 21:54:37 +0100 (BST)
CT DISCUSSION POINTS Obviously an ideal band plan would benefit as many stations as possible to the inconvenience of as few as possible. There seems to be a need to separate the QRSS modes and beacon
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2007-07/msg00044.html (10,444 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu