Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+472\.5\s+KHz\s+OK\s+for\s+Xtal\s+CW\s+qrg\s+\?\s+GB4FPR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+472\.5\s+KHz\s+OK\s+for\s+Xtal\s+CW\s+qrg\s+\?\s+GB4FPR\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: LF: 472.5 KHz OK for Xtal CW qrg ? GB4FPR (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:17:51 +0100; Certainly yes... reminds me of my first MF transmitter (which was "CW only"). It used two crystal oscillators separated by 472 to 479 kHz, but I had to detune one crystal during receive because even; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00116.html (12,488 bytes)
2. LF: 472.5 KHz OK for Xtal CW qrg ? GB4FPR (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:24:15 +0100; 472.5 KHz OK for Xtal CW qrg ? GB4FPR I did ask this a while ago, but to re-confirm suitable qrg for xtal cw 472.5 KHz ? Tnx -G..; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00359.html (8,648 bytes)
3. Re: LF: 472.5 KHz OK for Xtal CW qrg ? GB4FPR (score: 1): Author: "Graham" <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:11:18 +0100; Thanks Wolf Ok the Tx uses qty-2 xtals , with a keyed mixer for full break-cw , no tune facility Assume 472.1 >> 472.3 is ok as well ? G. From: wolf_dl4yhf Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2013 9:54 PM To:; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00399.html (11,201 bytes)
4. Re: LF: 472.5 KHz OK for Xtal CW qrg ? GB4FPR (score: 1): Author: wolf_dl4yhf <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 22:54:33 +0100; Hi Graham, If you can pull the crystal a bit (which should be ok with a series C, or a combination of L+C), it's ok. If you can only operate on exactly 472.5 kHz, potential QSO partners on the contin; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2013-01/msg00462.html (10,221 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]