Thanks very much Andrey, ufb! 73, Markus --Ursprüngliche Mitteilung-- Von: rn3agc <[email protected]> An: rsgb_lf_group <[email protected]> Verschickt: Fr, 30 Nov 2012 12:48 am Betreff: Re: L
Hi Steinar and Spiros, Many thanks for the reports :-) Looks like it works :-) It was the old message, so 1W was not correct any more. Just restarted the system, back in a few minutes. 73, Stefan Am
Would be gain 10*log(30/10) = 4.77 dB SNR when going from JT9-10 to JT9-30, assuming there is no negative effect due to QSB and so on? Would someone be interested in tests in JT9-30? S.. I think that
Stefan, what was the power this time? LA5VNA Steinar loc:JO59jq Mal and spam filtering: extremely STRONG www.opera.no Den 29.11.2012 19:41, skrev Stefan Schäfer:
Hello LF, Thanks to DF6NM, RN3AGC, F5WK, DF2JP, UA0SNV, SV8CS, W1VD, LA5VNA (and those which i forgot to mention) for the JT9-10 reports on 137.42 kHz!! I guess that was a first TA crossing in JT9 on
UA0SNV also gets positive JT9-10 decodes in OO18! He sent me this interesting image (allowed me to publish it here): https://dl.dropbox.com/u/19882028/LF/wsjt-x.JPG There seems to be a time sync prob
Yes, i'm back now. BTW in 100% TX mode. QRO was > +26 dB now. I'll run it over the night on 137.42 kHz, hoping for some transatlantic decodes. If i remember correctly there is no TA decode in JT9 on
Bingo 2329 3 -34 0.0 1419.83 0 DK7FC JN49IK http://www.w1vd.com/grabber.html Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2 UA0SNV also gets positive JT9-10 decodes in OO18! He sent me this interesting image (allowed me t
Thank you Spiros, Very good results! This is a good confirmation that it is likely that everything is fine on both your and my side, regarding time locking, frequency accuracy and drift! Makes me pro
