Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+1000\s+character\s+EbNaut\s+message\s+on\s+LF\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*LF\:\s+1000\s+character\s+EbNaut\s+message\s+on\s+LF\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. LF: 1000 character EbNaut message on LF? (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2017 21:53:11 +0200; Markus, Paul, Am 07.06.2017 20:56, schrieb Markus Vester: Considering an EbNaut sequence with e.g. N=1000 symbols, ...i first thought you are writing N= 1000 characters. Which is a good idea BTW! Don; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00072.html (10,184 bytes)
2. Re: LF: 1000 character EbNaut message on LF? (score: 1): Author: Markus Vester <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 05:56:50 -0400; Hi Stefan, technically that could be made to work. But is it making good use of EbNaut's capabilities? My understanding is that it's made for messaging in SNR-limited channels, close to the Shannon /; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00078.html (11,792 bytes)
3. Re: LF: 1000 character EbNaut message on LF? (score: 1): Author: DK7FC <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 12:10:32 +0200; Hi Markus, You are right, it would just be a game. But maybe someone else like IZ7SLZ would receive the same message, and there, the channel would be used much more. I assume IZ7SLZ does not hear you; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2017-06/msg00081.html (13,082 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]