Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[rsgb\-lf\-group\]\s+\[600MRG\]\s+LF\:\s+SlowJT9\s+update\s+$v0\.9\.12\.5$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[rsgb\-lf\-group\]\s+\[600MRG\]\s+LF\:\s+SlowJT9\s+update\s+$v0\.9\.12\.5$\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.12.5) (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 22:52:26 +0000; Hello Paul, Wayde, I will be monitoring JT9-2 and JT9-5 with 136kHz dial overnight. Just on my 472kHz antenna, but the background noise is way above the RX noise, so that should be OK. I will report; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00502.html (12,094 bytes)
2. Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.12.5) (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:54:18 +0000; Hello Paul, Wayde, I just had a look at the screen: 2200 -34 -0.8 800 5 VVV N1BUG 5 2230 -34 -0.8 800 5 VVV N1BUG 5 JT9-5 seems to work well !!! No JT9-2 copies so far. I am off to bed now (00; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00503.html (20,170 bytes)
3. Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.12.5) (score: 1): Author: <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 00:47:24 +0000 (UTC); Tnx Rik 73, Wayde K3MF --Original Message-- From: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]> To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <rsgb_lf_group; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00504.html (13,649 bytes)
4. Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.12.5) (score: 1): Author: Rik Strobbe <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 08:26:49 +0000; Hello Paul, Wayde, the full overnight transscript: JT9-2: 7 copies 0146 -30 -0.5 800 2 VVV N1BUG 2 0346 -29 -0.3 800 2 VVV N1BUG 2 0356 -29 -0.4 800 2 VVV N1BUG 2 0556 -28 -0.4 800 2 VVV N1BUG 2 0606; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00507.html (23,399 bytes)
5. Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.12.5) (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2018 06:45:07 -0500; Hello Rik, all, Thanks for the report. Very nice. By the way, this is the first time I was heard in Belgium on 2200m, so it's nice for me in that way too. :-) And thanks for all your work on SlowJT9!; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00509.html (16,029 bytes)
6. Re: [rsgb-lf-group] [600MRG] LF: SlowJT9 update (v0.9.12.5) (score: 1): Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2018 10:31:59 -0500; Do you think it would be interesting to try some JT9-5 vs JT9-2 on 630m? Or maybe JT9-5 vs JT9-1? I want to run JT9-5 vs JT9-2 one more night on 2200m, then I can QSY and try some test on 630m if it; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-12/msg00562.html (13,412 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]