Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[LF\:\s+VE1ZZ\s+Friday\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [LF: VE1ZZ Friday] (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 17:10:16 +0100
Hi Alberto, VE1ZZ was on 136.5, so you must have seen MM0ALM, and as Dave YXM has told me, MM0ALM was close to 136. It seems he was 40Hz higher than OK1FIG, which would put him on 135.995. 73, John,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00607.html (8,511 bytes)

2. Re: [LF: VE1ZZ Friday] (score: 1)
Author: "john sexton" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 02:44:12 -0800 (PST)
Hi Alberto, VE1ZZ was on 136.5, so you must have seen MM0ALM, and as Dave YXM has told me, MM0ALM was close to 136. It seems he was 40Hz higher than OK1FIG, which would put him on 135.995. 73, John,
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00616.html (8,080 bytes)

3. Re: [LF: VE1ZZ Friday] (score: 1)
Author: "Alberto di Bene" <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001 11:20:28 +0100
Mike, G3XDV On which freq. was Jack sending MM0ALM ? With my very poor antenna, I received several times 'MM0ALM', just about 40 Hz above the strong OK1FIG signal, but I thought it was MM0ALM calling
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00620.html (8,564 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu