Mail Archive Search: <+from:pws@legal-medicine.de>

Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 169 ]

Total 169 documents matching your query.

81. LF: DK7FC (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2011 17:20:37 +0200; Hi Stefan, Observing the Loran-C forest I accidentally received what looks like "dk7fc" calling "cq". Time: around 14:57 utc Frequency: approx. 137.71 kHz Antenna: small patch + BF981 Software: Baudl; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00139.html (8,481 bytes)
82. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 15:58:27 +0200; Hi Jim, You wrote: ... I would be interested to know what method you used to determine SNR for the different rod configurations. ... Simply by going the broadband way and using a very low noise, very; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00210.html (11,405 bytes)
83. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 16:17:14 +0200; Hi Daniele, Very accurate measurements had shown that Litz-Wire is better especially down at low frequencies <1 MHz. Especially MRI-builders reported positive effects. Myself I never could find a con; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00525.html (11,145 bytes)
84. Re: LF: My LF /p RX... (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 08 Sep 2011 14:05:33 +0200; Hi Stefan, Thank you for sharing! You wrote: ... The RX has a 50 Ohm input and uses a SBL-3 DBM. The circuit just uses a single BF862 amplification stage (about 20 dB gain), the rest is passive. LO f; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00552.html (10,144 bytes)
85. Re: LF: Re: Ferrite wideband antennas? (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 19:10:17 +0200; Hi Victor, You wrote: try a BFP640,rBB 1ohm.Noise as low as 300pV/sqrt(Hz) is possible.Very cheap,but one drawback,Ft is about 40GHz,not easy to get stable.For topband I use BD139 (yes a lf driver),r; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-09/msg00716.html (9,385 bytes)
86. Re: VLF: 21,5 kHz (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:17:25 +0200; Hi Stefan, Thanks for hint! Confirmed. I don't know - never seen before. Peter, df3lp; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00015.html (8,540 bytes)
87. LF: Re: LF reflector, since? (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 21:11:17 +0200; Hi Marco, http://www.df3lp.de/misc/ik1odo.gif Peter; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00284.html (10,724 bytes)
88. Re: LF: LF reflector, since? (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:19:29 +0200; Hi Stefan, A senile brain here remembers my first subscription in late summer 1998. And the first "dx by accident" in Nov. 1998: http://www.df3lp.de/misc/lplplp.gif (Johan?) Peter, df3lp; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00429.html (10,097 bytes)
89. LF: DK7FC 22oct11 in KI (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 15:51:44 +0200; Hi Stefan, ~20 dB SNR / 1.5Hz here in Kiel. Peter, df3lp; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-10/msg00523.html (8,412 bytes)
90. Re: VLF: 8970 Hz transmissions, soon again here (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 21:27:54 +0100; Hi Roger, Yes, me too. But imagine what happens when you are starting SpecLab. That's quite comparable I suppose. Peter; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00038.html (12,379 bytes)
91. Re: LF: X-ray class M (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:17:04 +0100; Hi Lubos, ...The M-class solar flare M1,9 was at 20:27 UT ... X! Peter, df3lp; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00356.html (8,408 bytes)
92. Re: LF: beacon to the east and west and north and south... (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2011 18:34:57 +0100; Hi Stefan, You wrote: ... Now i'm back on 136.172 kHz and will transmit all the time until early morning in DFCW-90 on 136.172 kHz. ... Clearly visible here at Kiel, ~32 dB below HGA22. I'm not sure; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00492.html (9,880 bytes)
93. Re: LF: Funny signal on VLF (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2011 17:35:38 +0100; Hi Halldor, You asked: Who is testing? ... Confirming that 3 staircases. Well known since some years. See our discussions and bearing trials there: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/VLF_Group/msearc; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00652.html (8,874 bytes)
94. Re: VLF: 8970 Hz transmissions, soon again here (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 18:20:24 +0100; Hi Roger, ... By the way, do we know exactly WHAT Paul Nicolson does to detect such weak signals so well? Has anyone heard/read technical details of his super-sensitive and well engineered receiving; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00659.html (13,033 bytes)
95. Re: VLF: 8970 Hz transmissions, soon again here (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:40:22 +0100; Hi again Roger, Addendum to my remarks of Paul's set-up: http://abelian.org/vlf/sysmap.html Peter, df3lp; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-11/msg00766.html (11,795 bytes)
96. Re: LF: Re: Re: OT: annual plots of hga22 (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 14:17:45 +0100; Hi Alan, Even "zipped" it's >20mb. But that's no problem. I can send you a link for downloading. I suppose you are running M$-Windows, so I will add "CRs" to the end of each line. Some programs canno; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00025.html (10,158 bytes)
97. LF: OT: annual plots of hga22 (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 23:37:42 +0100; Hi, May be this could be of interest to those involved in propagation effects at 2200m of wavelength. I'm observing hga22 ("space"-frequency) since May 2010. Bearing from here is ~SE, distance ~1001; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00101.html (9,450 bytes)
98. LF: Re: OT: 68.5 kHz (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:25:13 +0100; Hi Mal, Hm, no temporal orientation here. Should be "2011-12-20"... Yes, observed JJY at 40 kHz this afternoon. Unfortunately JJY at 60 kHz is covered by that huge signal from Anthorn. Best xmax whis; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00177.html (9,368 bytes)
99. Re: LF: BPC 68.5kHz and JJY 40kHz (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:05:12 +0100; Hi Lubos & Victor, Thanks fer confirmations! Reception of JJY is a real challenge here at Europe. Lucky guys who could receive it regularly. I wrote a reception notice to NTSC at the Chinese Academy; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00260.html (9,277 bytes)
100. Re: LF: Grabber grabber? (score: 1): Author: pws <[email protected]>; Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 21:29:37 +0100; Hi Mike, So I am still looking for a way to grab screen shots from several grabbers at once, and with file types including PNG and GIF. Any other suggestions? ... Use "wget": http://gnuwin32.sourcefo; /rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2011-12/msg00327.html (10,055 bytes)

Current List: 81 - 100
Page: [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9]