Hi Jean Pierre, Many thanks for the report and screen shots, what a pile up ! So lucky that we all managed to avoid giving each other QRM. Pity that conditions we not so good I saw nothing on Laurenc
Hi Laurence and Dmitry, I also saw the very clear "O" on Lawrence's grabber, but did you notice traces lower on 318/318.5 of a signal drifting up in frequency at about 21:00 could this have been PE1R
Hi Marcus, Many thanks for the identification. Very encouraging ! Normally my sig. does not drift but since I had only just switched on having been out all day and the shack was cold to start, I gues
Well I managed to fix my RA1792 receiver at last! But all this investigation has whetted my appetite for something better. At the moment I am torn between the AOR7030, conventional non DSP a bit diff
caused by AGC action, usually during the evening, when DI2AM is fairly strong. I tried running with the AGC off. Once the RF gain has been set correctly, works well. The downside is that it severely
Thanks John, Nice to know I can still get a signal across. Happy New Year to you and yours Laurie On 01/01/2008, John Andrews < [email protected]> wrote: Caught a fairly ghostly "AQ" in the local noise
Many thanks for all the replies to my mail. I have looked at the spec. for the AOR 7030 and it certainly looks fine, but I am put off by the Menu operating system. I liked the Racal it was simple to
Hi Rik, Many thanks for the QSO, it was great to work a new country.Your signal was S5 with QSB at 20:00 when we worked but improved to S6/7 with deep QSB later. Hope you get the PA sorted soon, I am
I tried a beverage here on 80 M (about 600ft long) and found it quite directional and low noise, by the way it was only 1m high and went mainly through dense shrubs and trees,over clay soil. I tried
Not strictly LF, I know, but I am interested in propagation especially, trans- polar routes. BUT what exactly is this experiment proving ? I don't doubt that several Mw directed at the moon will resu
Many thanks to those who responded to my mail on the subject of receivers for LF/QRSS. and my problems with my 1792. Paul Hendrik for the URL re circuits Tracey Gardner for the e'bay lead, and Warren
I have for a long time used a Racal 1792 reciever for QRSS modes on LF. This receiver failed recently,and I have been looking for a replacement receiver. This search reveals a problem most modern rec
John, I have been looking at your excellent 500kHz Grabber and notice that some strong signals are de-sentising the receiver and causing other weaker signals to show up less clearly. I belive you are
Okay Rick on ultrasonics...Had a practical experience with that with the break up of kidney stones by ultasonics...Called here the lithotrypsey machine or name like it....they zerode.. in on my kidn
Call CQ and see what happens. -- Original Message -- From: [email protected] lawrence mayhead To: [email protected] rsgb Has anyone heard any signals on 500kHz during the last
