Mike, Marcus Interesting too, in that, I am between the two stations and do not see anything on 8969.957 Hz. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 26/03/2011 11:32, Markus Vester wrote: Mike, this is interesting! Paul N
Hi Chris Its rather noisy at the moment but it looks like my 0.35m of copper wire is doing OK. When the ice has gone off the pond I will try the Loop outside (I am no longer a hardy beast like Stepha
Disappointing results today Chris, a delayed start due to your QSY, SpecLab going blank after frequency changes, then after a time on a restarted instance of SpecLab I noticed it wasn't frequency loc
It looks like the signal on Chris' frequency was not G3XIZ, Chris informs me he will not be TX'ing today. 73 Eddie G3ZJO Nothing seen here overnight in IO92ng. DJ8WX was the usual signal strength on
I have one CFL at the moment which gives the same pattern on 24kHz. Over the years I have had all makes play up, one decided to wipe out 10MHz, that was due to a dry joint on a suppression capacitor.
Hi Lubos RX is on this morning awaiting your test. Good Luck Eddie G3ZJO On 10/03/2011 19:08, Lubos OK2BVG wrote: Hello Stefan, Markus, Gerhard and all VLF enthusiasts! I was quite busy during last d
Hi Henny I am taking a look for you, are you TXing overnight? 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 07/03/2011 21:47, henny van elst wrote: Hi LF, The tx is on, freq.8.970.025Khz antenne curent 200mA, Henny pa3cpm 73's
Roger Very true, I thought you were going to outline what I saw between aprox. 14.30 and 15.30 UTC on 8.970039kHz today, a short line which caused me to check announced frequencies of operation at th
Hello Uwe Attached is the overnight grab of your signal at IO92ng. The signal has not reached the levels of the last test as yet. The grab label and waveform shows the strongest period of the night,
I shall be there too, in fact I have had his frequency range set up since his last TX session hoping to catch him testing again. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 17/03/2011 11:19, Gary - G4WGT wrote: Hi Chris, LF,
Hello Uwe A little less strong today just 6dB above the noise peaks. I have the 47uHz window on for you showing also your signal from yesterday. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23312120/zjo_grab.jpg (part ti
Hi Gerhard Nothing seen here overnight in IO92ng. DJ8WX was the usual signal strength on 8.97002kHz. G3XIZ is clear of the noise on 8.97666kHz. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23312120/zjo_grab.jpg 73 Eddie
Hi Chris Nice consistent signal from you today 10 to 15dbB above noise peaks at 6000 on my antenna which has a total vertical acreage of 2199.4sq mm, horizontal acreage 3.14 sq mm. I was surprised t
Hello Lubos I had to wait some time for the FFT to confirm that the signal had gone and then take a capture. I have 2 lines one is on 8.97kHz, actual reading 8.6999863kHz. I read on VLF group that Pa
OK Chris I Take it you went off and came back for a short time, this would be the basis of a short CW message/QSO possible at this distance. 73 Eddie On 18/03/2011 11:35, Chris Osborn wrote: LF, I sh
Hi Uwe I am very glad I left the RX on your frequency, I have a much more convincing capture now with peaks 10dB above the noise. The LOS here appears to be 06.04.23 Z, does that coincide with your o
Murphy's Law struck here overnight, a power outage closed down my computer for me and lost all but my last grab of Uwe timed at 05:20UTC. Now with everything re started we are awaiting the waterfalls
Yes that also went through my mind, I wonder if that was the inspiration for Andy's choice of suffix. Funny, no abbreviated versions of German colloquial terms ever go through my mind. Hmm I tell a l
Uwe Due to the long integration times it is difficult to pinpoint times. However I have a time written in ink on the palm of my hand written when I was in the shack looking at the LOS........0930UTC
Hi Chris When I wanted to calculate the distance between our QTH's Google maps was on a go slow, so I did a quick and dirty calculation from our QTH Loc's. My location is top left of my square, I not
