Hi Ossi Today's transmission in DFCW 600 and DFCW 6000. Peak 20.4dB S/N in 424uHz. 73 Eddie G3ZJO Attachment: oe5odl_110411.jpg Description: JPEG image
Hi Roger Yes its simpler than you think its gonna be, the original DropBox still works the same, all the other instances of Speclab save their capture under a different name. 73 Eddie I assume you ru
Mal Big question is, who is it. Actual frequency is 8.96976kHz visible on Paul's Spectogram from 0400UTC, frequency rising slightly. I have had a lot of QRM but now 6dB above the noise in 424uHz. and
Hi Uwe Wow that is a good signal, what FFT are you using, quite fast by the look of it. When can you give us another transmission. Peter G3PLX has an all digital home brew RX which equates to a virtu
Great. Very well done. Hi Ossie I was going to ask who owns that signal 13dB S/N in my DFCW600 Window. Grabber was going to be OFF, I will leave it switched on now:-) :-) 73 Eddie On 10/04/2011 08:58
Hi Stefan Yep, many look related, just a little bit of HTML play in a text editor, quicker than I thought it would be. I must admit it is much more useful for me too, on my Laptop in the lounge I can
Attached is a capture from my DFCW600 window on my Grabber. There is a carrier just below 8.9696kHz at around 0600UTC rising in frequency to 8.9696kHz by 0800UTC. Ossi was transmitting over this peri
Hi Chris Today's grab at 6000 424uHz shows the advantage of the kite lifted antenna. The period after 18.00 showed up as dots at 600 not decipherable as code, a faster screen would not have helped. I
Hello Stefan Yes I am locked to GQD I suppose it could have gone QRT for a time which may also explain the lack of trace in DFCW 6000 later spotted as 3 faint traces like ringing. That still leaves '
Hancock's words, 5Hz that's very nearly a screenfull. I have pulled my 600 screen down so you can see the strong lines which filled the screen around 1400 today petering out at 8.971kHh 'ish. When t
Very nice Walter, what is the distance. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 05/04/2011 20:47, Walter und Marianne Staubach wrote: OE5ODL now 20dB S/N with one mHz. 73 Walter DJ2LF
FB Mal I have a rather dirty line only at DFCW600, on the imagination border line, once again this afternoon I have nasty vertical noise bands. 73 Eddie On 07/04/2011 16:16, mal hamilton wrote: Eddie
Shorter low noise window periods now meant that G3XIZ was visible in my DFCW600 4.5mHz FFT only between 1100 UTC and 1500UTC today. Avery potent signal in DFCW600 424uHz 12-15dB S/N. Thanks for the s
Ossi your transmission at G3ZJO today in DFCW 600. 73 Eddie G3ZJO On 10/04/2011 09:45, Markus Vester wrote: Hi Ossi, LF, nice stady signal on 8969.9765 Hz since 7:40, up to 20 dB SNR (0.4 mHz) on o
Hi Lubos Attached is your full transmission as received here, max signal 7dB above the average noise. 73 Eddie G3ZJO Attachment: ok2bvg_040411_7dB.jpg Description: JPEG image
Hi Roger Highly unlikely is very good compared with 'impossible to get past your own garden fence' and good signals from the Czech Republic. Also 'no intention to radiate' doesn't prevent it happenin
Hi Lubos I am pretty sure we have here. I make your frequency 8.970034kHz. We will not get excited yet :-) How stable is your signal, it seems possibly not stable enough for QRSS 60000 to help. Conti
My Grabber :- http://dl.dropbox.com/u/23312120/zjo_grab.jpg Now on DFCW600 4.5mHz where Chris is showing 10dB above the noise floor. The best signal yet. N.B There is a frequency step in the display,
Not O/T really. I went on the bus to Market Harborough today. There were 4 people on the 870034 bus, it left on time and arrived on time. When we arrived a fool who wasn't on the bus said he doubted
Last night was very noisy on VLF. Chri's signal is now around 5dB above the night time average noise level. Showing the customary 12-13dB above the noise now. 73 Eddie G3ZJO
