Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 536 ]

Total 536 documents matching your query.

281. LF: Slow JT9 modes... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 07:03:09 -0400
Hello Rik and all LFers, I wish we could convince the developers to bring back JT9-2, JT9-5 and JT9-10 at least! I would even like to see JT9-30 supported. I believe these slow modes would allow for
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00053.html (15,642 bytes)

282. Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 07:59:59 -0400
Thanks for this Stefan. Reason to go on trying then. Maybe I can find an old PC with Windows XP or 7 on it to play with. Yes of course. I expect that but one still needs useful tools. I am a thrill s
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00058.html (15,587 bytes)

283. Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 09:00:04 -0400
I have been told the last version to support it is 095r3278. That's the one I have which does not work correctly under Win 10. I just tried it again. One problem is that trying to adjust the waterfal
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00061.html (14,733 bytes)

284. Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 14:14:12 -0400
Hello Chris, Dual boot would serve no useful purpose that I can see. Whatever version I run needs to run all of my shack software which is a 24/7/365 task. If I were convinced it would help, I would
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00071.html (15,447 bytes)

285. Re: LF: Slow JT9 modes... (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 06:28:00 -0400
Sounds interesting, Andy. Please correct me if I am wrong, but doesn't PSK require linear amplification? If so, it would eliminate many potential QSO partners. Regarding EbNaut, my understanding was
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00077.html (17,753 bytes)

286. Re: LF: Re: 137 kHz WSPR-2 on a 900m long ground loop, this weekend (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2018 17:12:53 -0400
Hi Stefan, I think the problem with the 4 character locator could be WSPRnet. You may have to do some work to get the 6 character locator into the system. You can read more about this here: http://qr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00112.html (28,439 bytes)

287. LF: Mystery signal on 137.000 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 18:13:44 -0400
For several hours there has been a very strong carrier on 137.000 kHz. I have seen this before but only for an hour or two at a time. It has been there today for at least 8 hours, maybe longer as I d
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00171.html (11,319 bytes)

288. Re: LF: Mystery signal on 137.000 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:36:15 -0400
Thanks John, I have seen it at least three times before, sometimes with modulation, sometimes without. But only for an hour or two. It's strong enough here that I have to notch it or else it hinders
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00173.html (13,313 bytes)

289. LF: Re: [rsgb_lf_group] Mystery signal on 137.000 (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2018 19:37:44 -0400
Interesting report, David. It is indeed quite a potent signal here. There is some fading now that darkness has set in. Paul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00174.html (13,343 bytes)

290. LF: Re: And again! (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 06:23:41 -0400
Hello Chris, I must say I am surprised. Apparently there were no EU stations transmitting! It's still horribly noisy over here. I hope it begins to quiet down soon. Paul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00211.html (11,770 bytes)

291. Re: LF: Re: And again! (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 06:58:28 -0400
Not since July when I got the new PA running. If it's still noisy there and you are hearing me, perhaps during the quiet months I will be strong enough for that 5 minute JT9 QSO. ;-) Paul
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00213.html (12,163 bytes)

292. Re: LF: Re: And again! (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:28:09 -0400
I'm afraid I can't help with that one. I spent some time trying to figure out how to implement SWR and over current protection but didn't come up with anything. I'll just have to use the FETs as sacr
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00218.html (13,327 bytes)

293. Re: LF: Re: And again! (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:08:35 -0400
Interesting. It remains to be seen how many FET deaths will occur here. Perhaps running them at 36V maximum (summer) will help them survive less than ideal operating conditions. I was a bit worried a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00220.html (14,138 bytes)

294. Re: LF: LF EbNaut TX Announcement (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2018 07:39:01 -0400
Although it will be some years before I can have the necessary equipment to run EbNaut I am *very* interested in QSO modes, so I want to comment on this. Please use more than 12 character messages. R
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-09/msg00225.html (15,435 bytes)

295. LF: 2200m (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 10:10:57 -0400
LF is improving, finally. Last night I received a WSPR transmission from EA5DOM for the first time. My signal is being heard by several stations across the Atlantic recently. I am still transmitting
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00165.html (11,101 bytes)

296. Re: LF: RE: 2200m (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2018 11:29:03 -0400
Hi Luis, I am happy to provide your first TA report on LF! :-) I hope I can give you many more. It's still a bit noisy here from lightning to the south, even if it is cold and snowing here yesterday
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00167.html (13,385 bytes)

297. Re: LF: LF WSPR spots J1LPB in Hamilton, Canada (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:25:49 -0400
I agree. The station is either using remote receivers around the world (more than one location) or just making up fake spots to upload to WSPRnet. I do not believe he could hear Europe stronger than
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00183.html (12,629 bytes)

298. Antenna resistance (Re: LF: EbNaut Autodecoder 137490 Hz: EA5DOM received) (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 06:34:57 -0400
Hi Luis, Markus, LF This is a very interesting topic for me too. My antenna resistance is very high, usually more than 100 ohms. I think there may be a few reasons. There are trees near the antenna w
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00200.html (15,886 bytes)

299. Re: LF: 2200m (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 27 Oct 2018 06:43:16 -0400
Hi Markus, Nice to see you reporting my station again! I am very surprised to see how many reports I get from across the pond, but I think location has a lot to do with it. :) There is a reason DXers
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00202.html (13,303 bytes)

300. Re: Antenna resistance (Re: LF: EbNaut Autodecoder 137490 Hz: EA5DOM received) (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2018 16:22:11 -0400
Thanks Jay and Laurence for weighing in on this. Like many amateur radio operators I am not likely to have opportunity to take field strength measurements, though I wish I could. It seems to me it mu
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2018-10/msg00221.html (22,383 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu