Return to KLUBNL.PL main page

Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:[email protected]: 67 ]

Total 67 documents matching your query.

61. LF: Re: QEX; 73KHz etc. (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 17:20:45 +0100
Hi all, Seasons greetings from IO64XM - somewhat dank and soggy at the moment. Been following all the recent happenings on the reflector with sick green envy that I haven't been able to get in among
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00890.html (9,469 bytes)

62. LF: sub bands (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 17:16:16 +0100
I think the sub band arrangement for very slow cw would be preferable to a free for all. Split frequency operation as well. Arrange for EU stations to transmit below 136 khz and the dx above 137.5 or
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00933.html (8,478 bytes)

63. LF: BIG/SMALL ANTENNAS (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 13:12:17 +0100
Your are all forgetting an important factor. The larger the antenna for the frequency of interest the greater the Radiation Resistance and consequently less losses in other compontents. A small anten
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00938.html (8,105 bytes)

64. LF: Re: Re: Apology (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 13:11:40 +0100
As many of the the stations worked were using 136.5 +/- 200 Hz, you can imagine my disappointment when QRM from the intermittent carrier appeared on 136.5, with strong sidebands +/- 100 Hz (already
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-01/msg00939.html (10,650 bytes)

65. LF: 3C85 (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:50:21 +0100
Thanks to all those that replied with the info that I needed. I came across some 3c5 cores ex TV and they have a u of 7000 very high. Someone was enquiring about these. I find these work well up to a
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00605.html (7,826 bytes)

66. LF: TR QSO TIME (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:49:23 +0100
Someone has suggested a qso would be valid if it took 24 hours. I think this is rediculous, because it is not likely that any operator would continuously try for this period of time. So for one signa
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00606.html (8,602 bytes)

67. LF: 3C85 (score: 1)
Author: "MAL HAMILTON" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 12:44:37 +0100
Hi All Does anyone know the permability and spec of 3c85 material? I cannot find this info in any of my tech info books. The T200 series seem very low like u10 powdered iron whereas the 3c5 ferrite t
/rsgb_lf_group-archives/html/rsgb_lf_group/2001-02/msg00634.html (7,774 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu